On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:32AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:38:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate level of > > > visibility on this mailing list? > > > > Looking at the http://l4x.org/k/ site, it appears that all -mm versions > > have broken ARM support with the defconfig, while Linus kernels at least > > build fine. > > It's very much in an arch maintainer's interest to make sure that > cross-compilers are easily obtainable. Any hints?
Been trying to achieve that since it's a FAQ on ARM lists. Even gone to the extent of setting up a separate mailing list, getting a volunteer to track what people want and do the hard work to build them. That was about 6 months ago, and I haven't seen any results. I was thinking at the time "great, this is one problem which should be solved". How silly of me. It seems, yet again, that it comes down to a case of "if rmk doesn't do it, it won't get done." Sad but true. Now, why do I keep feeling that I'm being taken advantage of all the time? Could it be the complete lack of productive help from anyone else. Anyway, going back to why -mm doesn't work: arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0xb64): In function `$a': : undefined reference to `rd_size' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 So "rd_size" got deleted in -mm kernels without reference to anyone else who's using it. Greeeeaaatttt.... -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
