On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 07:37:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So let's try to see how well that works - the last weeks of the
> > release tends to be me just waiting around to make sure nothing bad is
> > happening, so doing this kind of overlapping development *should* work
> > fine. Maybe it works so well that we'll end up doing it in the future
> > even if there *isn't* some kind of scheduling conflict that makes me
> > want to start the merge window before I'm 100% comfortable doing the
> > release for the previous version.
>
> one side-effect of this is that the git-commits-head list is now posting
> the commits you're queueing in your next branch but no way afaict to
> distinguish them from changes going into 3.15
>
> Can whoever maintains that hook add an X-branch header or something to make
> filtering them easier ?
Not to mention what happened when "next" got merged into "master": we
received another copy of all commits. I had a backlog of only 4000 commits
before the weekend, but after the pentecost holidays, this increased to 12000,
incl. 5000 duplicates or so.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
