On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> From: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>>
>> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>>
>> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>>
>> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
>> rules.  This bug has been around since before git.  Wow...
>>
>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <epa...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Did this patch get dropped somewhere?  Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I
> miss a later conversation about this?

Hmm.  It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree.  Crap.

IMO we need some kind of real tracking system for issues reported to
security@.  This shouldn't have been possible (and if I'd realized
that the patch got dropped, I wouldn't have publicly disclosed it).

For whoever applies this: it's CVE-2014-3917.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to