On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > while rebasing the dozens (currently around 60) of refused, ignored > > > or similiar bugfixes and patches I need to use a Linux kernel, I've > > > noticed that Jiri Kosinas patch here > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/214 > > > > > > doesn't apply anymore. > > > > > > Looking why, I've seen that a similiar patch from Srinivas Pandruvada > > > named > > > like the topic ended up in the kernel. > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > thanks for drawing this one from the boulevard of forgotten patches. > > > > I am actually not aware of any patch by Srinivas that would conflict with > > the one I've written -- could you please elaborate where you believe the > > conflict is? > > > > > Looking at the differences, I wonder if not all spin_lock() calls in > > > hid-sensor-hub.c should be changed into spin_lock_irqsave() like the > > > patch from Jiri Kosina did. > > > > There is a patch submitted by "reyad.atti...@gmail.com" > [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: Fix lockdep warning for dynamic callback locks. > > Already doing this, what you suggested?
I don't see this in my mailbox at all .. so where was this submitted to, and who merged it to which tree? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
