On 06/10/2014 04:59 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:28:06 -0000 > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > >> There is no point to keep the task ref across the check for lock >> owner. Drop the ref before that, so the protection context is clear. >> >> Found while documenting the chain walk. > > This looks fine, I just hate the subject. I don't see how it is > 'deobfuscating" the chain walk. How about: > > rtmutex: No need to keep task ref when checking lock ownership > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> Thanks, Lai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
