On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:04:43AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Example output (view in non-proportial font): > > > > Performance counter stats for 'true' (10 runs): > > > > 0.175672 task-clock (msec) # 0.555 CPUs utilized > > ( +- 1.77% ) █▄▁▁▁▁▁▁.. > > 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec > > 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec > > 114 page-faults # 0.647 M/sec > > ( +- 0.14% ) ▁█▁▁████.. > > 520,798 cycles # 2.965 GHz > > ( +- 1.75% ) █▄▁▁▁▁▁▁.. > > 433,525 instructions # 0.83 insns per > > cycle ( +- 0.28% ) ▅▇▅▄▇█▁▆.. > > 83,012 branches # 472.537 M/sec > > ( +- 0.31% ) ▅▇▆▄▇█▁▆.. > > 3,157 branch-misses # 3.80% of all > > branches ( +- 2.55% ) ▇█▃▅▁▃▁▂.. > > > > 0.000316660 seconds time elapsed > > ( +- 1.78% ) █▅▁▁▁▁▁▁.. > > The noise data is not aligned vertically in the changelog - is it in > the real code? It should be.
I still dislike those spark lines, I still think they should plot the distribution and not just the first 8 or so values.
pgpKIg3ew89N6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
