On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:43:16 +0200 (CEST) > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:57:25 -0500 > > > "Brad Mouring" <bmour...@ni.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Store whether owner is blocked itself and drop locks > > > > > */ > > > > > + next_lock = task_blocked_on(task); > > > > task_blocked_on(task) is not clear to me, the recipient of the > > > > return is the only clue that hints at what the function does. > > > > > > Well, this is more than confusing, it's the only user, all other users > > > are task_blocked_on_lock(), and this causes the code not to compile. > > > > Grr, yes. > > Luckily you are not posting this to that grumpy IRQ maintainer. He'd > shoot some frozen sharks your way if you sent him patches like this ;-)
Rightfully so. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
