On 11 Jun 2014, at 21:04, Denis Kirjanov <k...@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> On 6/11/14, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:13:07PM +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> I got a trace while running 3.15.0-08556-gdfb9454:
>>> 
>>> [  104.534026] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at
>>> address 0xc00000007f000000
>> 
>> Were there any kmemleak messages prior to this, like "kmemleak
>> disabled"? There could be a race when kmemleak is disabled because of
>> some fatal (for kmemleak) error while the scanning is taking place
>> (which needs some more thinking to fix properly).
> 
> No. I checked for the similar problem and didn't find anything relevant.
> I'll try to bisect it.

Does this happen soon after boot? I guess it’s the first scan
(scheduled at around 1min after boot). Something seems to be telling
kmemleak that there is a valid memory block at 0xc00000007f000000.

Catalin--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to