On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:53:55PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:01 PM, John Whitmore <arig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm having a problem with a DS3234 SPI based RTC chip and rtc/hctosys.c on > > the > > 3.10.29 kernel of the RaspberryPi. I'm not sure this is a bug or not but > > thought I'd ask. I've enabled the kernel config option for HCTOSYS which, on > > boot, should set the system's date/time to the value read from the RTC. I > > tried tihs but it would never happen on the RPi. I eventually found in > > syslog > > that the kernel boot is attempting to execute the hctosys functionality > > prior > > to the SPI being initialised. As a result of this when hctosys is attempted > > there is not /dev/rtc0 yet. A short time later the DS3234 RTC is initialised > > but by then it's too late. > > > > Once the system has booted and I've logged in I can read and write to the > > RTC > > and all seems good but /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/hctosys is '0' indicating that > > the > > system time was not set on boot. > > > > There is a "deprecated" warning in the syslog coming from the spi of the > > board > > file so perhaps that is the cause. So is this a bug? And if so what can I do > > to resolve it. The hctosys is on a "late_initcall" so not sure of timing. > > Sigh. Yea, this issue was brought up previously, but we never got > around to a solution that could be merged. > > Basically hctosys is late_init, but if the driver is a module, it > might not be loaded in time. Adding hooks at module load time when > RTCs are registered could be done, but then you have the issue that > userspace might have set the clock via something like ntpdate, so > HCTOSYS could then cause the clock to be less accurate. > > So we need to make the HCTOSYS functionality happen at RTC register > time, but it needs to set the clock only if nothing has set the clock > already. This requires a new timekeeeping interface - something like > timekeeping_set_time_if_unset(), which atomically would set the time > if it has never been set. > > You can read some of the previous discussion here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/17/533 >
Thanks a million for that information I'll have a look, as I might try and resolve the issue. > I'd be very interested in patches to resolve this! > > thanks > -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/