Matt Mackall wrote: > One last plea for the 2.4 scheme: > > I think naming the interim releases -pre/-rc has done this admirably > for 2.4.
I agree. This makes more sense to me than some implicit understanding about the parity of the revision. rc is easy to understand, and '-pre' is easy to understand once you recognize it means 'beta'. I've been bothered in the 2.6 series that rc ("release candidate"?) tags were applied to kernels that were clearly NOT release candidates. ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Electronics ============================= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/