On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/12, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h
>> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h
>> > @@ -39,12 +39,17 @@
>> > * payload are exactly the same layout.
>> > *
>> > * This interface usage is as follows:
>> > - * struct iovec iov = { buf, len};
>> > + * struct iovec iov = { buf, len };
>> > *
>> > * ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET, pid, NT_XXX_TYPE,
>> > &iov);
>> > *
>> > - * On the successful completion, iov.len will be updated by the kernel,
>> > - * specifying how much the kernel has written/read to/from the user's
>> > iov.buf.
>> > + * On entry, iov describes the buffer's address and length. The buffer's
>> > length
>> > + * must be a multiple of the size of a single register in the register
>> > set. The
>> > + * kernel never reads or writes more than iov.len, and caps the buffer
>> > length to
>> > + * the register set's size. In other words, the kernel reads or writes
>> > + * min(iov.len, regset size).
>
> I think this should be self-obvious ;) otherwise why do we need to pass
> the length of the buffer?
>
> But of course I won't argue with the additional documentation, perhaps you
> can re-send this patch to akpm? Usually ptrace changes are routed via -mm
> tree.
>
> But if we update the kernel header, then probably it would be more important
> to update the man-page. To me the description of GETREGSET looks good, but
> probably it could also mention that buflen should be multiple of regsize (as
> you did above). Add Michael.
Can someone send a patch, then?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
