Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these? I based them off of Linus's original list.
thanks, greg k-h ------ Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and what ones are not, into the "linux-release" tree. - It can not bigger than 100 lines, with context. - It must fix only one thing. - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a problem..." type thing.) - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue. - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how the race can be exploited. - It can not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace cleanups, etc.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
