On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 15:39 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:05:16PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > The first is with virtio-scsi between what has been merged in scsi.git > > for "virtio_scsi: use cmd_size", and the "virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX > > modes in SCSI host LLD" below. (Adding Paolo + hch CC') > > Just curious, why did we decide to take the virtio-scsi patches > through the target tree? Seems like taking them through the scsi > tree would have been a lot simpler.
We've been ineffectively trying to split them between target and initiator, since it's effectively both. Now that we seem to have a workable process, why don't we just take everything (target scsi-queue and vhost) through the SCSI tree, that way we don't get into these problems in future. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
