On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> This adds the new "seccomp" syscall with both an "operation" and "flags"
> parameter for future expansion. The third argument is a pointer value,
> used with the SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER operation. Currently, flags must
> be 0. This is functionally equivalent to prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, ...).

Question for the linux-abi people:

What's the preferred way to do this these days?  This syscall is a
general purpose "adjust the seccomp state" thing.  The alternative
would be a specific new syscall to add a filter with a flags argument.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to