On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> wrote:
> > > On linux-next, allyesconfig has a 0.0001% savings as a result of the > patch, but I'd be worried about the extra temp variable it allocates on > the stack that is evident in the mm/slab.c disassembly unless all cases > can be audited to show that we're not potentially deep. A 0.0001% change means it's not worth changing, and we may be able to mark this up as a fluke in Michal's results. I'll give it a try on my 4.6.3 compiler. -- Steve > > text data bss dec hex filename > 108573045 23488016 51580928 183641989 af22785 > vmlinux.before > 108572908 23488016 51580928 183641852 af226fc > vmlinux.after -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
