On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Russell King wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I love BK, but what BK does well is merging and maintaining trees full of 
> > good stuff. What BK sucks at is experimental stuff where you don't know 
> > whether something should be eventually used or not.
> 
> Wait a minute - why would stuff going into 2.6.x.y be "experimental"
> stuff?  Wasn't stability the whole point of this tree?

The point being that _before_ a patch gets accepted, it's in that "limbo" 
state, waiting for people to veto it or say "yes".

That limbo state is not well done with BK. 

                Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to