Keeping __blk_mq_drain_queue() as a separate function doesn't buy us
anything and it's gonna be further simplified. Let's flatten it into
its caller.
This patch doesn't make any functional change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f49b2ab..eda78c8 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -108,8 +108,16 @@ static void blk_mq_queue_exit(struct request_queue *q)
__percpu_counter_add(&q->mq_usage_counter, -1, 1000000);
}
-static void __blk_mq_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q)
+/*
+ * Guarantee no request is in use, so we can change any data structure of
+ * the queue afterward.
+ */
+void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
+ spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ q->mq_freeze_depth++;
+ spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
while (true) {
s64 count;
@@ -124,19 +132,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q)
}
}
-/*
- * Guarantee no request is in use, so we can change any data structure of
- * the queue afterward.
- */
-void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
-{
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- q->mq_freeze_depth++;
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-
- __blk_mq_drain_queue(q);
-}
-
static void blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
bool wake = false;
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
