On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:13:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:42:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > I still think it's totally the wrong direction to pollute so > > many fast paths with this obscure debugging check workaround > > unconditionally. > > OOM prevention should count for something, I would hope.
OOM in what scenario? This is getting bizarre. If something keeps looping forever in the kernel creating RCU callbacks without any real quiescent states it's simply broken. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
