On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:13:48AM +0000, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-06-18, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:44:13PM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> > 
> > This whole insn decoding machinery above looks like adapted from
> > arch/x86/lib/insn.c. You should merge it with the generic code in
> > insn.c instead of homegrowing it here only for the purposes of MPX.
> > And if it doesn't work for your needs, you should should extend the
> > generic code to do so.

> Petkov, as we discussed on initial version of this patchset, general
> insn framework didn't work out well and I have tried to use generic
> struct insn, insn_field, etc. for obvious benefits.

Let me repeat myself: "And if it doesn't work for your needs, you should
extend the generic code to do so."

We don't do homegrown almost-copies of generic code.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to