From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 0819b2e30ccb93edf04876237b6205eef84ec8d2 upstream.

Vince reported that using a large sample_period (one with bit 63 set)
results in wreckage since while the sample_period is fundamentally
unsigned (negative periods don't make sense) the way we implement
things very much rely on signed logic.

So limit sample_period to 63 bits to avoid tripping over this.

Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-p25fhunibl4y3qi0zuqmy...@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 6e0f9648fa68..01eeaf6cc95a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6956,6 +6956,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
        if (attr.freq) {
                if (attr.sample_freq > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
                        return -EINVAL;
+       } else {
+               if (attr.sample_period & (1ULL << 63))
+                       return -EINVAL;
        }
 
        /*
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to