On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Mark Salter wrote:

> Commit 2d5a5612bc (arm64: Limit the CMA buffer to 32-bit if ZONE_DMA)
> forces the CMA buffer to be 32-bit addressable if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is
> defined. This breaks CMA on platforms with no 32-bit addressable DRAM.
> This patch checks to make sure there is 32-bit addressable DRAM before
> setting the 32-bit limit. If there is none, no limit is placed on the
> CMA buffer. This allows a single kernel (with CONFIG_ZONE_DMA defined)
> to support platforms requiring the 32-bit limit and platforms with no
> 32-bit limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index c5415e2..2925576 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -149,8 +149,17 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>       early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>  
>       /* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
> -     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
>               dma_phys_limit = dma_to_phys(NULL, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) + 1;
> +             /*
> +              * If platform doesn't have DRAM within the dma_phys_limit,
> +              * remove the limit altogether. This allows one kernel (with
> +              * CONFIG_ZONE_DMA defined) to support platforms with 32-bit
> +              * only devices and platforms with no 32-bit DRAM.
> +              */
> +             if (dma_phys_limit <= memblock_start_of_DRAM())
> +                     dma_phys_limit = 0;
> +     }
>       dma_contiguous_reserve(dma_phys_limit);
>  
>       memblock_allow_resize();

It is a shame that we have very similar logic, all dependent on 
memblock_start_of_DRAM(), in both zone_sizes_init() and 
arm64_memblock_init() and the latter having to be called before the 
former.  I assume there's no way to make this cleaner in the bootstrap 
code so the dma_to_phys(NULL, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) + 1 limit can be handled 
properly in a single location?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to