On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:34 +0200, Mathias Krause wrote: > On 25 June 2014 09:48, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 09:35 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> Speaking of dangling pointers: A similar disaster would happen if some > >> code containing pi_* calls gets copy-pasted to some non-__init > >> function. > > > > This is my biggest issue with adding these new, > > somewhat obscure macros. > > modpost will handle these cases.
If so, then I don't see a problem. > >> Could checkpatch learn to warn about calling these functions > >> from the wrong context? > > > > It's not possible. checkpatch works on patch chunks. > > Any patch chunk may not contain the function attributes. > > checkpatch.pl -f might detect them, though :/ Something like your awk script would be easier. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
