> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael Aquini [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:16 PM
> To: Motohiro Kosaki
> Cc: [email protected]; Andrew Morton; Rik van Riel; Mel Gorman; Johannes 
> Weiner; Motohiro Kosaki JP; linux-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: export NR_SHMEM via sysinfo(2) / si_meminfo() 
> interfaces
> 
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Motohiro Kosaki wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rafael Aquini [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:40 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton; Rik van Riel; Mel Gorman; Johannes Weiner;
> > > Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
> > > Subject: [PATCH] mm: export NR_SHMEM via sysinfo(2) / si_meminfo()
> > > interfaces
> > >
> > > This patch leverages the addition of explicit accounting for pages
> > > used by shmem/tmpfs -- "4b02108 mm: oom analysis: add shmem vmstat"
> > > -- in order to make the users of sysinfo(2) and si_meminfo*() friends 
> > > aware of that vmstat entry consistently across the interfaces.
> >
> > Why?
> 
> Because we do not report consistently across the interfaces we declare 
> exporting that data. Check sysinfo(2) manpage, for instance:
> [...]
>            struct sysinfo {
>                long uptime;             /* Seconds since boot */
>                unsigned long loads[3];  /* 1, 5, and 15 minute load averages 
> */
>                unsigned long totalram;  /* Total usable main memory size */
>                unsigned long freeram;   /* Available memory size */
>                unsigned long sharedram; /* Amount of shared memory */ <<<<< 
> [...]
> 
> userspace tools resorting to sysinfo() syscall will get a hardcoded 0 for 
> shared memory which is reported differently from
> /proc/meminfo.
> 
> Also, si_meminfo() & si_meminfo_node() are utilized within the kernel to 
> gather statistics for /proc/meminfo & friends, and so we
> can leverage collecting sharedmem from those calls as well, just as we do for 
> totalram, freeram & bufferram.

But "Amount of shared memory"  didn't mean amout of shmem. It actually meant 
amout of page of page-count>=2.
Again, there is a possibility to change the semantics. But I don't have enough 
userland knowledge to do. Please investigate
and explain why your change don't break any userland. 






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to