On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkos...@suse.cz> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Johan Hovold wrote: > >> Did you see the attribute-race series I posted? Not sure how best to >> handle the dependency, as those patches should probably go in through >> the LEDs tree, while the first patch in that series (adding the groups >> field) is a dependency for this patch. >> >> Jiri, how would this best be solved? > > I think the best course of action here is to gather Acks from the > respective maintainers, and take the whole lot trough a single tree > (probably the leds tree in this case) to avoid unnecessary intra-tree > dependencies in a rather straighforward situation like this. >
I think the better place is HID/input tree, since this patch depends on the initial one which is not in my tree. I'm going to merge Johan's whole patchset and this patch probably depends Johan's work too. -Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
