On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:06:36PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/18/14, 8:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> >+static struct ordered_event*
> >+ordered_events_get(struct ordered_events_queue *q, u64 timestamp)
> >+{
> >+ struct ordered_event *new;
> >+
> >+ new = alloc_event(q);
> >+ if (new) {
> >+ new->timestamp = timestamp;
> >+ queue_event(q, new);
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ return new;
> >+}
>
> The _get name does not really correlate with what is happening -- ie.,
> allocate a new event and add it to the queue. There is no reference taken
> either.
ook.. so how about ordered_events_alloc ordered_events_free
>
> >+
> >+static void
> >+ordered_event_put(struct ordered_events_queue *q, struct ordered_event
> >*iter)
> >+{
> >+ list_del(&iter->list);
> >+ list_add(&iter->list, &q->cache);
> >+ q->nr_events--;
> >+}
>
> Similarly here with the _put. In this case the function is moving the event
> from one list to another. And how about something else for the name besides
> iter -- oe, or oevent?
how about 'event' ?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
