Ping. Thanks, Lai
On 06/26/2014 07:27 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 06/20/2014 03:44 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:33:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>> When POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared, the running worker's local CPU should >>> be the same as pool->cpu without any exception even during cpu-hotplug. >>> >>> This fix changes "(proposition_A && proposition_B && proposition_C)" >>> to "(proposition_B && proposition_C)", so if the old compound proposition >>> is true, the new one must be true too. so this fix will not hide any >>> possible bug which can be hit by old test. >>> >>> CC: Jason J. Herne <jjhe...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> >> >> Applied to wq/for-3.17 with minor updates. >> >> Nice set of cleanups. Thanks! >> > > Hi,Tejun > > I found the slight earlier 6 patches are in wq/for-3.17. > But these two patches (in this email thread) are not in wq/for-3.17 yet. > > workqueue: clear POOL_DISASSOCIATED in rebind_workers() > workqueue: stronger test in process_one_work() > > Thanks, > Lai > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
