On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Keith Busch wrote:

Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]

Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

This is definitely a fix for "genirq: Provide generic hwirq allocation
facility", but the changelog doesn't describe what the problem is and the
title that this somehow fixes irq_free_descs() doesn't make any sense.

My mistake, I used the component from the commit I bisected the bug
down to.

It's the equivalent of just doing

-       irq_free_descs(from, cnt);
+       irq_free_descs(from, i - from);

I'd suggest the patch title be changed to

        genirq: Fix memory leak when calling irq_free_hwirqs()

and the changelog state

irq_free_hwirqs() always calls irq_free_descs() with a cnt == 0 which
makes it a no-op since the interrupt count to free is decremented in
itself.

Yes, I like your suggestion. Should I submit a v2, or will maintainer
replace the changelog?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to