On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:08:16 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:26:10PM -0400, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > Unless we want to double-penalize an overrun task, the time after the > > deadline > > and before the current time is already accounted in the negative > > dl_se->runtime > > value. So we can leave it as is in the case of dmiss && rorun. > > Juri? > > > Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhs...@gmail.com> > > --- > > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > > index fc4f98b1..67df0d6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > > @@ -579,10 +579,8 @@ int dl_runtime_exceeded(struct rq *rq, struct > > sched_dl_entity *dl_se) > > * the next instance. Thus, if we do not account that, we are > > * stealing bandwidth from the system at each deadline miss! > > */ > > - if (dmiss) { > > - dl_se->runtime = rorun ? dl_se->runtime : 0; If we didn't return 0 before, we are going to throttle (or replenish) the entity, and you want runtime to be <=0. So, this is needed. > > - dl_se->runtime -= rq_clock(rq) - dl_se->deadline; > > - } A little pessimism in some cases, due to the fact that we use both rq_clock and rq_clock_task (for the budget). Thanks, - Juri > > + if (dmiss && !rorun) > > + dl_se->runtime = dl_se->deadline - rq_clock(rq); > > > > return 1; > > } > > -- > > 1.8.1.2 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/