On 01/07/2014 at 19:01:12 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 18:48:51 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 01/07/2014 at 18:35:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > > > If I read this right, disabling 'USE_OF' results in still using > > > the old clock interface. Is that intentional? If you want to always > > > use COMMON_CLK now, the above can probably be simplified to > > > > > > config AT91_PMC_UNIT > > > def_bool !ARCH_AT91X40 > > > select COMMON_CLK > > > > > > and all references to AT91_USE_OLD_CLK, COMMON_CLK_AT91 and > > > OLD_CLK_AT91 be removed. > > > > Yeah, this is intentional we still have 30 or so boards that we have to > > migrate to DT. Until then, we want to be able to boot a kernel without > > CCF. The next step in the migration is to switch those boards to DT, > > possibly using an hybrid DT/pdata approach until we can get rid of the > > board files. Then, we will be able to get rid of the old clk > > implementation (and a few other drivers still living in mach-at91). > > Ok, I see. Do you expect those 30 boards to work if COMMON_CLK_AT91 > is enabled, or are there known problems with that? > > If you have reason to believe it doesn't work, maybe you can expose > the selection of the clock interface to users, e.g. like >
We actually do the opposite, when a board without DT support is selected, the old clock support is also selected even when also selecting CONFIG_OF. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
