On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:26:26PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 
> > Factor out initialization of array cache to use it in following patch.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> 
> Not sure what happened to my
> 
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
> 
> from http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=139951195724487 and my comment still 
> stands about s/arracy/array/ in the patch title.

This is new one with applying your comment.

Thanks.

--------------8<--------------
>From 5d4f47d839ae4fc0796b633d41858d9c87fd235d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:34:38 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] slab: factor out initialization of array cache

Factor out initialization of array cache to use it in following patch.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
---
 mm/slab.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 8f9e176..6fa3fdf 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -791,13 +791,8 @@ static void start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
        }
 }
 
-static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int entries,
-                                           int batchcount, gfp_t gfp)
+static void init_arraycache(struct array_cache *ac, int limit, int batch)
 {
-       int memsize = sizeof(void *) * entries + sizeof(struct array_cache);
-       struct array_cache *nc = NULL;
-
-       nc = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node);
        /*
         * The array_cache structures contain pointers to free object.
         * However, when such objects are allocated or transferred to another
@@ -805,15 +800,25 @@ static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int 
entries,
         * valid references during a kmemleak scan. Therefore, kmemleak must
         * not scan such objects.
         */
-       kmemleak_no_scan(nc);
-       if (nc) {
-               nc->avail = 0;
-               nc->limit = entries;
-               nc->batchcount = batchcount;
-               nc->touched = 0;
-               spin_lock_init(&nc->lock);
+       kmemleak_no_scan(ac);
+       if (ac) {
+               ac->avail = 0;
+               ac->limit = limit;
+               ac->batchcount = batch;
+               ac->touched = 0;
+               spin_lock_init(&ac->lock);
        }
-       return nc;
+}
+
+static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int entries,
+                                           int batchcount, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+       int memsize = sizeof(void *) * entries + sizeof(struct array_cache);
+       struct array_cache *ac = NULL;
+
+       ac = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node);
+       init_arraycache(ac, entries, batchcount);
+       return ac;
 }
 
 static inline bool is_slab_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to