Hi Greg, The st/ide-tape/osst llseek changes havent been applied for what reason?
And what about the rest of fixups which Andrew sent you? I suppose they didnt pass the -stable criteria. Can you share your thoughts with the rest of us? On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:39:23AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > And to further test this whole -stable system, I've released 2.6.11.2. > It contains one patch, which is already in the -bk tree, and came from > the security team (hence the lack of the longer review cycle). > > It's available now in the normal kernel.org places: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.11.2.gz > which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives > that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that > way in the future. > > A detailed changelog can be found at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.2 > > A bitkeeper tree for the 2.6.11.y releases can be found at: > bk://linux-release.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.11 > > The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below. > > I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch itself, > as it is small enough to do so. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > > ------- > > > Makefile | 2 +- > fs/eventpoll.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > Summary of changes from v2.6.11.1 to v2.6.11.2 > ============================================ > > Greg Kroah-Hartman: > o Linux 2.6.11.2 > > Linus Torvalds: > o epoll: return proper error on overflow condition - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/