Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not sure if this is related to your patch. But I ran into > BUG() with sysrq-t with your patch. > > Thanks, > Badari > > BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! > > Modules linked in: joydev sg st floppy usbserial parport_pc lp parport > ipv6 ohci_hcd i2c_amd756 i2c_core evdev usbcore raid0 dm_mod nls_utf8 > Pid: 15433, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.11-mm1n > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8013d094>] <ffffffff8013d094>{__do_softirq+84} > RSP: 0018:ffff8101dff83f68 EFLAGS: 00000206 > RAX: ffffffff80651880 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000004 > RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000103 RDI: ffff8101d7c77680 > RBP: ffff810177ffbe48 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000100 > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 > R13: 00002aaaaaafb000 R14: 000000000000000a R15: 0000000000000001 > FS: 00002aaaab2890a0(0000) GS:ffffffff80651880(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 00002aaaaaafb000 CR3: 00000001bb2a0000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > > Call Trace:<IRQ> <ffffffff8013d165>{do_softirq+53} > <ffffffff8010ef59>{apic_timer_interrupt+133} > <EOI> <ffffffff80403055>{_spin_unlock_irqrestore+5} > <ffffffff801bd357>{write_sysrq_trigger+55} > <ffffffff80183579>{vfs_write+233} > <ffffffff80183713>{sys_write+83} > <ffffffff8010e5ce>{system_call+126}
That's probably just a false positive in Ingo's soft-lockup detector. Long streams of irq-context serial console output will do that. Ingo, we already have a touch_nmi_watchdog() in the sysrq code. It might be worth adding a touch_softlockup_watchdog() wherever we have a touch_nmi_watchdog(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/