Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:35 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: do checkpoint for the renamed inode
>
> If an inode is renamed, it should be registered as file_lost_pino to conduct
> checkpoint at f2fs_sync_file.
> Otherwise, the inode cannot be recovered due to no dent_mark in the following
> scenario.
>
> Note that, this scenario is from xfstests/322.
>
> 1. create "a"
> 2. fsync "a"
> 3. rename "a" to "b"
> 4. fsync "b"
> 5. Sudden power-cut
>
> After recovery is done, "b" should be seen.
> However, the result shows "a", since the recovery procedure does not enter
> recover_dentry due to no dent_mark.
As we know CP is expensive, how about modifying checkpointed value directly
in nat cache at step #3? So "b" could be fsynced with dent_mark at step #4.
>
> The reason is like below.
> - The nid of "a" is checkpointed during #2, f2fs_sync_file.
> - The inode page for "b" produced by #3 is written without dent_mark by
> sync_node_pages.
>
> So, this patch fixes this bug by assinging file_lost_pino to the "a"'s inode.
> If the pino is lost, f2fs_sync_file conducts checkpoint, and then recovers
> the latest pino and its dentry information for further recovery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index 96f1dd1..1b3cae0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -411,9 +411,6 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> }
>
> f2fs_set_link(new_dir, new_entry, new_page, old_inode);
> - down_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> - F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_pino = new_dir->i_ino;
> - up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
>
> new_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> down_write(&F2FS_I(new_inode)->i_sem);
> @@ -446,6 +443,10 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> }
> }
>
> + down_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> + file_lost_pino(old_inode);
> + up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> +
> old_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> mark_inode_dirty(old_inode);
>
> @@ -455,9 +456,6 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> if (old_dir != new_dir) {
> f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry,
> old_dir_page, new_dir);
> - down_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> - F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_pino = new_dir->i_ino;
> - up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> update_inode_page(old_inode);
> } else {
> kunmap(old_dir_page);
> --
> 1.8.5.2 (Apple Git-48)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
