On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 21:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Greg, > > Reading this story about Qualcomm lawyers shooting > DMCA takedown requests lightly against github projects: > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/14/07/04/1455200/qualcomm-takes-down-100-github-repositories-with-dmca-notice > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTczNDU > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-02-Qualcomm.md > > It appears to me that the mere presence of those lines > in Linux staging: > > grep -r "Qualcomm" . |grep -i "rights" > ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c: * CopyRight (C) 2007 > Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. > ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c:* CopyRight (C) 2007 > Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. > ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_hw.c:/* CopyRight (C) 2007 > Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > might be contradicting the Dual MPL/GPL license > expressed by MODULE_LICENSE() for those files. > Perhaps we should ask some clarification on > licensing of those files to Qualcomm ? Trying to stop idiot DMCA takedowns is pointless. If some random robot issues a takedown the kernel.org folks will get another pointless DMCA notice and the Linux Foundation will have to go and kick backsides. Qualcomm screwed up massively - the problem is that fake DMCA takedowns are never punished. Qualcomm shouldn't just be apologising, they should facing an automatic financial penalty for each bogus filing and whoever signed the notices should be facing their professional body. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
