Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not convinced about the practicality of converting all static > initialisations to code-based initialisations though
This is the first one I recall seeing. All the other conversions were replacing static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; with static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); and replacing { lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } with { spin_lock_init(lock); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/