The second range of this particular regulator,
starts at 1.60V, not as 1.55V as it was originally
implied by code.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
---
based on datasheet only. Also boot tested on another,
yet-to-be-released HW. A 50mV difference is probably
not a big deal for any users of DCDC4 but it's still
good to be correct.
drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c
index 9effe48..8b7a0a9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct regulator_linear_range
ldo1_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
static const struct regulator_linear_range dcdc4_ranges[] = {
REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1175000, 0x0, 0xf, 25000),
- REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1550000, 0x10, 0x34, 50000),
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 0x10, 0x34, 50000),
};
static struct tps_info tps65218_pmic_regs[] = {
--
2.0.0.390.gcb682f8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
