Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabi...@samsung.com> writes:
> +
> +#undef memcpy
> +void *kasan_memset(void *ptr, int val, size_t len);
> +void *kasan_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len);
> +void *kasan_memmove(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len);
> +
> +#define memcpy(dst, src, len) kasan_memcpy((dst), (src), (len))
> +#define memset(ptr, val, len) kasan_memset((ptr), (val), (len))
> +#define memmove(dst, src, len) kasan_memmove((dst), (src), (len))

I don't think just define is enough, gcc can call these functions
implicitely too (both with and without __). For example for a struct copy.

You need to have true linker level aliases. 

-Andi

-- 
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to