On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:28:33AM +0100, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> The issue of boundary checking on bitmaps is introduced by this commit
> in below.
>
> commit 4d852ef8c2544ce21ae41414099a7504c61164a0
> Author: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrm...@calxeda.com>
> Date: Tue Feb 25 13:09:53 2014 +0100
>
> arm: dma-mapping: Add support to extend DMA IOMMU mappings
>
> Multiple bitmaps were introduced as extension. If it needs to extend
> a bitmap, it still check whether the allocation exceeding the total
> size, not current bitmap size. So change the condition from
> mapping->bits to PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhu...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 4c88935..d7da5c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1089,9 +1089,9 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __alloc_iova(struct
> dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->lock, flags);
> for (i = 0; i < mapping->nr_bitmaps; i++) {
> start = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(mapping->bitmaps[i],
> - mapping->bits, 0, count, align);
> + PAGE_SIZE, 0, count, align);
I'm probably just missing something, but what guarantees that the bitmap is
PAGE_SIZE? It looks to me like we could easily go off the end of the bitmap
if arm_iommu_create_mapping is called with a small size parameter.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
