Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 15:58 +0200 schrieb Stefan Agner:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Am 2014-07-11 14:09, schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde:
> > IMHO it should be 4 seperate patches:
> > - dt
> > - clocks
> > - flexcan_get_berr_counter fixes
> > - your flexcan enhancements
>
> Ok, will split.
>
> >> @@ -362,7 +374,7 @@
> >>
> >> esdhc1: esdhc@400b2000 {
> >> compatible = "fsl,imx53-esdhc";
> >> - reg = <0x400b2000 0x4000>;
> >> + reg = <0x400b2000 0x1000>;
> >
> > What's that doing here? :)
>
> That's an error I just stumbled upon. I know it's not related but it's
> such a small change... Do I need to make a separate patch for that or
> can I include it in the FlexCAN dt commit?
>
Upstream changes are meant to be traceable by reading the git log. Thus
no drive-by changes are allowed in unrelated commits. This absolutely
needs to be a separate patch.
Regards,
Lucas
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
