On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:51:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Greg KH <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > > >> > Any comments are welcomed! > > >> > > >> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous. > > > > > > I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even > > > support? Are there machines out there shipping like this? > > > > We've always had memory nodes. > > > > A classic case in the old days was a two socket system where someone > > didn't populate any DIMMs on the second socket. > > That's a obvious; don't do that then case. Its silly.
True. We should recommend that anyone running Linux will email you for approval of their configuration first. > > There are other cases too. > > Are there any sane ones Yes. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
