On 07/11/2014 09:29 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> index 076b11f..df9908b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ struct sigcontext {
> __u64 rip;
> __u64 eflags; /* RFLAGS */
> __u16 cs;
> - __u16 gs;
> - __u16 fs;
> + __u16 __pad2; /* Was called gs, but was always zero. */
> + __u16 __pad1; /* Was called fs, but was always zero. */
> __u16 ss;
> __u64 err;
> __u64 trapno;
I'm just wondering if this is likely to cause compile error in existing
code. I guess worst case we can just revert this patch...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
