Neil Brown wrote:
If a data corruption bug has been there for 10 weeks without being noticed, then the real risk is not that great. We are calling it "-release", not "-hardened".
I disagree. If there's a simple, obvious, small fix that passes all the other criteria, it should go into -stable ASAP after passing review. Then the -stable maintainers will push the fix to Andrew/Linux, and it will go into the next 2.6.x.
Let's keep -stable as good as possible, while still abiding by all the other rules.
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
