On 07/14/2014 07:49 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Varka Bhadram
>> On 07/14/2014 02:32 PM, Jongsung Kim wrote:
>>> This patch enables the ethtool utility to control the WOL function
>>> of the PHY connected to the GEM/MACB. (if supported)
> ...
>>> +static int macb_set_wol(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_wolinfo 
>>> *wol)
>>> +{
>>> +   struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>> +   struct phy_device *phydev = bp->phy_dev;
>>> +   int err = -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> +   if (phydev)
>>> +           err = phy_ethtool_set_wol(phydev, wol);
>>> +
>>> +   return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> I think we can do in this way:
>>
>> if (phydev)
>>      return phy_ethtool_set_wol(phydev, wol);
>> else
>>      return -ENODEV;
>>
>>
>> we can save err. What do you say ...?
> 
> I would do:
>       if (!phydev)
>               return -ENODEV;
>       return phy_ethtool_set_wol(phydev, wol);
> 
> Although it might even be worth moving the NULL test into the function.
> (sort of depends on style and the number of callers who need to do the test.)
> 

Totally agreed. I'd be better to submit a patch about it first.

>       David
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to