On 07/15/14 10:04, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:30:08PM +0400, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> Some code in slub could validly touch memory marked by kasan as unaccessible.
>> Even though slub.c doesn't instrumented, functions called in it are
>> instrumented,
>> so to avoid false positive reports such places are protected by
>> kasan_disable_local()/kasan_enable_local() calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> mm/slub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 6ddedf9..c8dbea7 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -560,8 +560,10 @@ static void print_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void
>> *object)
>> if (!(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
>> return;
>>
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>> print_track("Allocated", get_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC));
>> print_track("Freed", get_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE));
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>
> I don't think that this is needed since print_track() doesn't call
> external function with object pointer. print_track() call pr_err(), but,
> before calling, it retrieve t->addrs[i] so memory access only occurs
> in slub.c.
>
Agree.
>> }
>>
>> static void print_page_info(struct page *page)
>> @@ -604,6 +606,8 @@ static void print_trailer(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
>> page *page, u8 *p)
>> unsigned int off; /* Offset of last byte */
>> u8 *addr = page_address(page);
>>
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>> +
>> print_tracking(s, p);
>>
>> print_page_info(page);
>> @@ -632,6 +636,8 @@ static void print_trailer(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
>> page *page, u8 *p)
>> /* Beginning of the filler is the free pointer */
>> print_section("Padding ", p + off, s->size - off);
>>
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> +
>> dump_stack();
>> }
>
> And, I recommend that you put this hook on right place.
> At a glance, the problematic function is print_section() which have
> external function call, print_hex_dump(), with object pointer.
> If you disable kasan in print_section, all the below thing won't be
> needed, I guess.
>
Nope, at least memchr_inv() call in slab_pad_check will be a problem.
I think putting disable/enable only where we strictly need them might be a
problem for future maintenance of slub.
If someone is going to add a new function call somewhere, he must ensure that
it this call won't be a problem
for kasan.
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> @@ -1012,6 +1018,8 @@ static noinline int alloc_debug_processing(struct
>> kmem_cache *s,
>> struct page *page,
>> void *object, unsigned long addr)
>> {
>> +
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>> if (!check_slab(s, page))
>> goto bad;
>>
>> @@ -1028,6 +1036,7 @@ static noinline int alloc_debug_processing(struct
>> kmem_cache *s,
>> set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, addr);
>> trace(s, page, object, 1);
>> init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_ACTIVE);
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> return 1;
>>
>> bad:
>> @@ -1041,6 +1050,7 @@ bad:
>> page->inuse = page->objects;
>> page->freelist = NULL;
>> }
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1052,6 +1062,7 @@ static noinline struct kmem_cache_node
>> *free_debug_processing(
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, *flags);
>> slab_lock(page);
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>>
>> if (!check_slab(s, page))
>> goto fail;
>> @@ -1088,6 +1099,7 @@ static noinline struct kmem_cache_node
>> *free_debug_processing(
>> trace(s, page, object, 0);
>> init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
>> out:
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> slab_unlock(page);
>> /*
>> * Keep node_lock to preserve integrity
>> @@ -1096,6 +1108,7 @@ out:
>> return n;
>>
>> fail:
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> slab_unlock(page);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, *flags);
>> slab_fix(s, "Object at 0x%p not freed", object);
>> @@ -1371,8 +1384,11 @@ static void setup_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
>> page *page,
>> void *object)
>> {
>> setup_object_debug(s, page, object);
>> - if (unlikely(s->ctor))
>> + if (unlikely(s->ctor)) {
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>> s->ctor(object);
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> + }
>> }
>> static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
>> @@ -1425,11 +1441,12 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
>> page *page)
>>
>> if (kmem_cache_debug(s)) {
>> void *p;
>> -
>> + kasan_disable_local();
>> slab_pad_check(s, page);
>> for_each_object(p, s, page_address(page),
>> page->objects)
>> check_object(s, page, p, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
>> + kasan_enable_local();
>> }
>>
>> kmemcheck_free_shadow(page, compound_order(page));
>> --
>> 1.8.5.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
