On Tuesday 15 July 2014 16:45:39 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> +#ifndef _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
> +#define _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
> +
> +#define NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS    32
> +/* Reserve 32 additional interrupts for GPIO IRQs */
> +#define NR_IRQS                      (NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS + 32)

Is this intentional? I would expect that you use SPARSE_IRQ
instead and not define NR_IRQS.

> +#ifndef NO_IRQ
> +#define NO_IRQ                       (-1)
> +#endif

New architectures should no longer define NO_IRQ. Please fix all users
you encounter instead.

> diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8770d50
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>

Maybe move this into drivers/irqchip/? Probably doesn't matter either way,
your choice.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to