On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > @@ -335,16 +335,15 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct ti > */ > static void timekeeping_forward_now(struct timekeeper *tk) > { > - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta; > + cycle_t cycle_now, delta; > struct clocksource *clock; > s64 nsec; > > clock = tk->clock; > cycle_now = clock->read(clock); > - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask; > - tk->cycle_last = clock->cycle_last = cycle_now; > + delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, clock->cycle_last, clock->mask);
Errr.. Was dropping the update to tk->cycle_last and clock->cycle_last intended? That seems broken. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/