On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:25:06AM +0100, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
> Introduce function to generate move wide (immediate) instructions.

[...]

> +u32 aarch64_insn_gen_movewide(enum aarch64_insn_register dst,
> +                           int imm, int shift,
> +                           enum aarch64_insn_variant variant,
> +                           enum aarch64_insn_movewide_type type)
> +{
> +     u32 insn;
> +
> +     switch (type) {
> +     case AARCH64_INSN_MOVEWIDE_ZERO:
> +             insn = aarch64_insn_get_movz_value();
> +             break;
> +     case AARCH64_INSN_MOVEWIDE_KEEP:
> +             insn = aarch64_insn_get_movk_value();
> +             break;
> +     case AARCH64_INSN_MOVEWIDE_INVERSE:
> +             insn = aarch64_insn_get_movn_value();
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             BUG_ON(1);
> +     }
> +
> +     BUG_ON(imm < 0 || imm > 65535);

Do this check with masking instead?

> +
> +     switch (variant) {
> +     case AARCH64_INSN_VARIANT_32BIT:
> +             BUG_ON(shift != 0 && shift != 16);
> +             break;
> +     case AARCH64_INSN_VARIANT_64BIT:
> +             insn |= BIT(31);
> +             BUG_ON(shift != 0 && shift != 16 && shift != 32 &&
> +                    shift != 48);

Would be neater as a nested switch, perhaps? If you reorder the
outer-switch, you could probably fall-through too and combine the shift
checks.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to