Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is even a slight performance win in the > uniprocessor case: > > w/o any patch: > > Mb Rep Thr CLine User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec > 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.15s 0.01s846860.493 848882.424 > 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.16s 0.01s827724.160 830841.482 > 200 3 1 1 0.00s 0.16s 0.01s827724.160 827364.176 > > w/prefault patch > > 200 MB allocation > > Mb Rep Thr CLine User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec > 200 3 1 1 0.02s 0.48s 0.05s860119.275 859918.989 > 200 3 1 1 0.02s 0.46s 0.04s886129.730 886551.621 > 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.47s 0.04s887920.166 886855.775
But the system time went through the roof. Would that be accounting inaccuracy? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
