On 07/16/2014 01:25 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16 July 2014 04:17, Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c

@@ -1110,9 +1092,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
*dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)

  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
         /* check whether a different CPU already registered this
-        * CPU because it is in the same boat. */
+        * CPU because it is one of the related CPUs. */
         policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
-       if (unlikely(policy)) {
+       if (policy) {
+               cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(policy, cpu, true);

This is just a waste of time at boot as ... (see below)

Why? Please explain.


Nevermind. Figured what you meant. I just need to improve the "if" check.

-Saravana

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to