Hi,

Chris' patch is not enough to fix this bug. I made a patch as follows and 
verified it can work.  Could you please give out some comments about this patch?


Thanks,
Zhonghui

>From 72d6f5b56fa04290fd3a055a3333de1d89e7c8d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:29:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio 
thread

781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.

Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
index e636d9e..8369e56 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
@@ -992,8 +992,18 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
                }
        }
 
-       if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
-               wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
+       if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
+               if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
+                       wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
+               } else {
+                       mmc_release_host(host);
+                       mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
+                       host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
+                       mmc_host_clk_release(host);
+                       mmc_claim_host(host);
+               }
+       }
+
        mmc_release_host(host);
 
        host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
-- 1.7.1



On 2014/7/15 12:40, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> From: Chris Ball <ch...@printf.net>
> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio 
> thread
>
> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
>
> Reported-by: Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
> [Patch suggested by Jaehoon Chung]
> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <ch...@printf.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> index e636d9e..11cc4e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,8 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
> +     if (!err && host->sdio_irqs &&
> +                     !(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD))
>               wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>       mmc_release_host(host);
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to